Nine questions from a published research measure, scored in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere and nothing is stored.
Answer about the person you are closest to romantically β a current partner, or the last one if you are not seeing anyone now. There are no right answers, and the useful ones are usually the first thing you think.
A place to start:
This is a description of a pattern, not a diagnosis, and patterns move. Attachment style is not fixed and is not a mental health condition.
Attachment style describes what you expect from people you are close to, and what you do when those expectations feel uncertain. It came out of research on how children respond to separation from a caregiver, and was extended to adult relationships in the 1980s.
It is not a personality type and not a diagnosis. It is closer to a habit of relating β learned early, reinforced by what happened afterwards, and more changeable than the internet usually suggests.
Most attachment research does not sort people into four boxes. It measures two separate dimensions and describes where you sit on each.
Attachment anxiety is how much you worry about whether the other person is still there β how quickly a short reply becomes evidence, and how long reassurance lasts before it needs topping up.
Attachment avoidance is how uncomfortable closeness itself feels β how easily you depend on someone, and whether letting them see the bottom of how you feel seems like a reasonable idea.
The four familiar names are just the corners of those two scales. Secure is lower on both. Anxious-preoccupied is higher on anxiety. Dismissive-avoidant is higher on avoidance. Fearful-avoidant is higher on both. Your scores matter more than which corner you land nearest, especially if you are close to the middle.
The nine statements are the ECR-RS β Experiences in Close Relationships, Relationship Structures β developed by R. Chris Fraley and colleagues and published in 2011. It is a short form of the 36-item ECR-R and is used widely in published research.
We reproduce the items and score them exactly as published, rather than writing our own questions. A quiz somebody invented can tell you something about yourself only by accident.
A style is a description, not an explanation, and it is least useful as a label to hand to a partner. It is most useful as a prompt: if the result says you scan for signs of being dropped, the interesting question is what you do in the twenty minutes after you notice.
Attachment patterns shift, most reliably through relationships where the thing you expect to happen does not happen, repeatedly and over time. Therapy is one route to that. So is a relationship that stays steady while you learn it is steady.
It uses the ECR-RS, a research questionnaire with published reliability, and scores it as published. What it cannot do is account for the specific relationship you had in mind, a bad week, or how you answer on a day you are already upset. Treat it as a well-built starting point rather than a verdict.
Yes, and this is the part most quizzes skip. Attachment patterns are learned and they move, usually slowly and usually through repeated experience rather than insight alone.
No. The scoring runs in your browser, your answers are never sent to us, and there is nothing to delete afterwards. You do not need an account to take it.
No. It is not a disorder, it is not in any diagnostic manual, and no attachment style is broken. Anxious and avoidant patterns are common and are strategies that made sense somewhere.
Both are uncomfortable with closeness. The dismissive pattern is not especially worried about being left; the fearful pattern is, which is why it can look like wanting someone and backing away from them at the same time.
The nine questions are the ECR-RS (Experiences in Close Relationships β Relationship Structures), from R. Chris Fraley's measures page at the University of Illinois, reproduced and scored as published.